Get

Ropa Dispositivos Amazon y Accesorios Apps Libros Cine, TV y Música Electrónica Informática y Oficina Videojuegos Juguetes y juegos Hogar, Jardín, Bricolaje y Mascotas Alimentación y bebidas Belleza y Salud Deportes y aire libre Industria, empresas y ciencia Handmade Mujer Hombre Niña Niño Bebé Ropa especializada

Law Making as an Institutional Game: Who wins and who loses from judicial reforms? (Studies in Modern Law and Policy)


Reseña del editor Judicial institutions are directly involved in law making and law enforcement. Their core business tightly refers to the venture, the fate, and the prospect of the law. And yet, despite numerous investigations of how far and deep courts intervene in policy making as well as how far and deep they reshape the law, very little has been revealed about the impact law making processes have on courts and more generally on the judicial system. This book seeks to fill this gap by examining the law making process that unfolds in the context of judicial reforms. A `reform’ is meant here as an intentional change brought about in the institutional, organisational, cultural, procedural, managerial, setting where courts operate. Therefore, the book deals with `change’ of the judiciary. This change is not considered as the outcome of the reform - rather the change is considered, and accordingly conceptualised, as a process. As such, the book tells the story of the redistribution of power, resources, legitimacy, and capacity triggered by the process of the reform experienced by the judicial actors, both individual and institutional. Theoretically, the book takes an institutionalist approach and draws on research over a 10 year period and an extensive empirical field comprising 8 EU member states. The analysis is informed by a large dataset drawn from the author’s sole research along with those of two international research groups. Biografía del autor Daniela Piana is Professor of Political Science at the University of Bologna and Associate Fellow at the Institut des Hautes Etudes sur la Justice in Paris. She has been carrying out comparative research on judicial policies in Western and Eastern Europe as well as on judicial systems. Recently she has worked on a comparative analysis of the intersection between judicial independence and judicial accountability in Italy. She has published extensively on rule of law, constitutional policies, courts, and managerial schemes in public prosecutor offices. Her most recent book is: Networking the Rule of Law: How Change Agents Reshape Judicial Governance in the EU, Ashgate, 2015.

Law Making as an Institutional Game: Who wins and who loses from judicial reforms? Studies in Modern Law and Policy: Amazon.es: Daniela Piana: Libros en idiomas extranjeros
Law Making as an Institutional Game: Who wins and who loses from judicial reforms? Studies in Modern Law and Policy: Amazon.es: Daniela Piana: Libros en idiomas extranjeros
Daniela Piana,Law Making as an Institutional Game: Who wins and who loses from judicial reforms? (Studies in Modern Law and Policy),Routledge,147247189X,General,Law: General & Reference,LAW / General,Comparative law,Law & society, sociology of law,Methods, theory & philosophy of law,Politics & government,Social law & Medical law,Jurisprudence & philosophy of law,Law & society,Social law,Law,ANF: Law,Non-Fiction,TEXT


SHOP NOW AMAZON


Oferta Del Día


Law Making As an Institutional Game : Who Wins …
Find product information, ratings and reviews for Law Making As an Institutional Game : Who Wins and Loses from Judicial Reforms? (Hardcover) online on Target.com.
Wildy & Sons Ltd — The World’s Legal Bookshop …
Pre‑Order Law Making as an Institutional Game: Who Wins and Who Loses from Judicial Reforms?, by Daniela Piana, ISBN 9781472471895, to be published by Routledge ...
Law Making as an Institutional Game: Who wins …
Judicial institutions are directly involved in law making and law ... Home Law Making as an Institutional Game: Who wins and who loses from judicial reforms ...
Chapter 2 Institutional capacities for Better Regulation
Institutional capacities for Better Regulation . R. egulatory management needs to find its place in a country’s institutional architecture,
Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions
22/02/2019  · This book presents a quantitative history of constitutional law in the United States ... directly in making ... for judicial independence ...
Law - Wikipedia
Iustitia ("Lady Justice") is a symbolic personification of the coercive power of a tribunal: a sword representing state authority, scales representing an ...
United States: The Constitution | Law Library of …

Federal Circuit Patent Precedent: An Empirical Study of ...
Federal Circuit Patent Precedent: An Empirical Study of Institutional Authority and IP Ideology ... (who wins and who loses in a case) ... judicial decision making.
Institutional racism - Wikipedia
Institutional racism ... Within the federal judicial system, ... U.S. Civil Service Reform) In 1913 with segregation the law of the land, ...
Parliament - Wikipedia
02/11/2001  · In modern politics and history, a parliament is a legislative body of government. Generally, a modern parliament has three functions: representing the ...
Copyright © 2016-219 by es.NewsJS